Disposable Knowledge

Pod slurping, stemming, cloaking, biometric authentication, insecure direct object reference, and mashups are a few of the topics I’ve been reading up on lately. Which of these topics will I need? None immediately.

But this is where the difference in prices comes into play. Prednisone is an important drug in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile Manisa buy tamoxifen tablets dermatomyositis, crohn disease, ulcerative colitis and asthma. Dapoxetine 30 mg tablet dosage is determined by taking into account the medical condition of the patient and the weight of the patient.

To purchase valtrex online, click on the valtrex online link or call 1-888-974-8666. More recently, it has been repositioned as clomid tablet cost Tychy a potential tool to eradicate and/or control a variety of ectoparasites, as well as helminths such as tapeworms in a variety of farm and household environments \[[@cr5]--[@cr8]\], and thus has a potential role in the battle. It is recommended for all women who want to become pregnant.

Knowledge comes and goes. Some technologies enter my life and leave after a short stay and years later I can barely recall them. Some technologies enter my life and stay around.

So the questions become … How fast can I learn? What are the resources I turn to when I have to learn something new? And how deeply can I embrace a new topic?

I suppose what’s cool about the chronic change in my life is not just that I’ve become adaptable or flexible but change has taught me to be a perpetual student.

Someone recently asked me if I was frustrated by learning things and having chunks of my needed knowledge go away. Not at all was my response. Given that I purposely look for projects that will alter the technical environment I’m working in and that I don’t specialize in one industry, it’s nearly a given that some of what I need to know today will be unneeded on my next assignment.

Knowing a little bit about a lot of things is pretty typical in testing. I like change. I feel that change keeps me on my toes.

One thing I’ve had to learn about learning is assessing when I need to deep dive on a topic versus when a skim of information is enough. Deeper knowledge may be helpful but it’s unlikely and impractical to become masterful on many topics. And time is nearly always a factor.

Another thing I’ve learned about learning is how I learn. I know for me, small bites work best. I’ll find one article or one book or one resource and dig for a bit and walk away. I go back for the next chunk of information. Learning for me is iterative.

When I go back for more, I’ll collect multiple resources and skim. If I find one resource – an article, book, website that speaks especially well to me, I’ll go through the entire piece. I look for the resource that makes the most sense to me with no preference to whether the “piece” is a book, article, website or person. Format doesn’t matter – clarity does.

The only exception to learning in small bites is when I corner someone to talk to me and then I soak up as much information as I can for as long as I can get the person to talk to me. If I know a person whose time is in high demand then I find a day and time where we’re less likely to be interrupted and try to get the longest session I can.

I suppose I feel I’ve had many masters in my grasshopper life. And for reasons that I believe may tie back to my previous newspaper reporting days, I can nearly always get people to talk to me.

My resources are usually pretty diverse. There is no one book; there is no one website, no one book store and no one person. I’m ok with that. I think this goes back to the way I feel about software testing which is that testing makes me a seeker.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.